Brentwood High School - Brentwood, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DESANDO Michael R. | V V | V V V V V | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 2 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 3 | HEMPE Jake | V V | V V V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LEE Daniel | V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 5 | ST. CLAIR Regan A. | V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 6 | DALBERG Leif | V V V | V V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 7 | ANCONA Christopher | V V | V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 8 | KABER Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | D V V V V | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 | |
| 10 | SHEIKH Arham | V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 11 | PANDYA Poojan | D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 12 | BRAXTON Jacob Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | HERNANDEZ Angel | D V V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 14 | DYCKMAN Andrew P. | D V | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 15 | CHEN Zihao | V V D D V | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 16 | WANG David Y. | D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 17 | MITRA Alain | V D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 18 | LACAVA Anthony | D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 19 | AMODEMO Charles | D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 20 | LEE Joon | V V V D D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 | |
| 21 | HYDARAL Muhammid Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 23 | GRILLO Chris Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | MONTALBINE Aidan | D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 25 | SCILEPPI Jonathan | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 26 | SCHKODA Jeremy T. | D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 27 | OLIVER Tyler | V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 28 | NEBER Austin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | FERNANDEZ Denis Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | CHANG Jarod Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | PAZZINI Alex Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | RAU Bobby J. | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | MANZIO Mike Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | DONG Wilson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | RAPPAPORT Cole | D D V | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
| 36 | GRASSIE James | V D V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 | |
| 37 | MEHTE Neil Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | BURNS Andrew T. | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 39 | LETELLIER Axel | D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 40 | MEDINA Kenneth Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | CAPUTO John | D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 42 | BONILLA Emanuel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | DESENA Giovanni Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | ELIASSI Sean Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | CAMERON Nick Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | YOUNG Noah | D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 47 | SHARBANI Noah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | GUDEL Justin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | CERON Jheremy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | WALSH Liam | D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 51 | STEINMAN Keith Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | VERDERAME Steven Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | YOUNGWALL Matt | D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 54 | HUGHES Sean Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | ZHANG Zhou Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | SHI Jachi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 57 | VARADY Brandon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.