USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Cadet Men's Saber

Friday, February 28, 2020 at 12:00 PM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LAI Adam J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 19%
2 DODRILL Grant 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 29%
3 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 41%
3 NIL Michael Y. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 21%
5 HAMMERSTROM Jared 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 26%
6 CHIN Matthew W. 100% 99% 93% 72% 39% 12% 1%
7 FRISHMAN Ethan J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 19%
7 SO Hananiah 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 53% 16%
9 LINSKY Matthew 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 25%
10 JEAN Noe T. 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 20%
10 WIND Nicky E. 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
12 DIACOS Jordan 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 9%
13 HARGENRADER Kailen A. 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 5%
14 LIU kelly 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
15 MORRILL Justin 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 15%
16 SIMAK Joseph P. 100% 100% 95% 72% 34% 8% 1%
17 KIM Avery J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 39%
18 WILSON Jude 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 23%
19 JARAMILLO Tobias L. 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 8%
20 HONG Steven 100% 100% 90% 60% 23% 4% -
21 CHEN Oscar 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3%
22 CHAN Matthew 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 9%
23 FENG Leo 100% 98% 83% 50% 17% 2%
24 KEEFE Duncan 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 4%
25 WOODWARD Connor 100% 99% 93% 67% 28% 4%
26 BERMAN Luca 100% 100% 92% 66% 31% 8% 1%
27 ZHOU Justin 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 36% 8%
28 KOGAN Benjamin 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 15% 2%
29 HUANG Tyler T. 100% 73% 31% 7% 1% -
30 MAKLIN Edward P. 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 4% -
31 GINIS Nathan 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 11% 1%
32 GHENEA George Philipe 100% 93% 60% 22% 4% -
33 MORRILL William 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 40% 9%
34 YANG Richard 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 22% 3%
35 HOUTZ Jackson 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3%
36 LEE Justin 100% 99% 86% 54% 21% 4% -
37 CHAVES Matthew J. 100% 89% 55% 20% 4% -
38 DENNER Maximilian P. 100% 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 2%
39 LU Timothy 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 9% 1%
40 COX Luis E. 100% 86% 48% 15% 3% - -
41 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 91% 58% 21% 4% -
42 REN Richard 100% 77% 35% 8% 1% -
43 CHEONG Heonjae 100% 100% 95% 74% 34% 6%
44 GREENBAUM Ian L. 100% 98% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
45 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. 100% 100% 96% 77% 44% 14% 2%
45 BURDAN Gabriel 100% 49% 12% 2% - - -
47 SHTEIN Yan 100% 62% 21% 4% - - -
48 SHTEYN Mark 100% 97% 79% 44% 15% 3% -
49 MEHTA Krish 100% 90% 58% 21% 4% - -
50 ALTIRS Alexander 100% 98% 78% 39% 10% 1%
51 PAN Andrew W. 100% 97% 81% 46% 14% 2%
52 LEE Aydan J. 100% 96% 76% 40% 12% 1%
53 GEORGE Daniel 100% 50% 12% 1% - -
54 LO Alexander 100% 87% 49% 15% 2% -
55 CHENG Cody 100% 92% 62% 24% 5% - -
56 SHERWOOD Hayden F. 100% 98% 79% 42% 13% 2% -
57 HUANG Maxwell H. 100% 96% 64% 24% 5% - -
58 COLE Alexander 100% 99% 87% 59% 26% 6% 1%
59 GRASS James D. 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 10% 1%
60 LOWHAM-RUZZO Alexander J. 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% - -
61 NOBLE Colin 100% 94% 69% 33% 8% 1%
62 WEIL Asher D. 100% 25% 2% - - - -
63 CHENG Kyle 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% -
64 MCCARTHY Gabriel 100% 97% 77% 40% 12% 2% -
65 PANDEY Neil 100% 74% 32% 8% 1% - -
66 OLIVER Isaac 100% 21% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.