Premier Fencing Academy - Carmichael, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | HOLZ William A. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
2 | HOLZ Daniel | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
3 | FILER Joshua | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | |
3 | RAMANAN Govind | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
5 | CAISSE Simon B. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
6 | LI Daniel | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
7 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | |
8 | SCOVILL Tenzin S. | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
9 | POFF James | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
10 | LAM Ethan | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
11 | GAO Marcus | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | - |
12 | HRISTOV Kris | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
13 | YUNG Andrew | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
14 | LLAMAS Martin | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
15 | FENG Zefan | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
16 | GARDNER Gabriel | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.