Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ISERT Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
2 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
3 | CHRETIEN Pauline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
3 | BENNING Friederike | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
5 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
6 | YEE-WADSWORTH Sofia L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
7 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
8 | KAIN Isabel J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
9 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
10 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% |
11 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
12 | KUNDU Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
13 | KANDEL Margaret C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
14 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
15 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
16 | WOLF Lisa A. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
17 | COBERT Helen G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
18 | ZAKHAROV Anne (Anya) E. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | HEINRICH Eva | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
20 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
21 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
21 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
23 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | PARDO Sarah | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
25 | YING Julia Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
26 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
27 | SINGH Aayushi | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
28 | GOLDEN Danielle | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
29 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
30 | MCMAHON Kathleen M. | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
31 | PAYNE Elizabeth | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
32 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
33 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
34 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
35 | ABRAMSON Liliana M. | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.