Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XUE Alanna | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 13% |
| 2 | DU Hannah | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 3 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% | |
| 3 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
| 5 | MUSTO Isabella | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 6 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 7 | LOGAN Jade | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 8 | FU Qihan | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 9 | XIANG Emma | - | 3% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 4% | |
| 10 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 11 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 12 | KERR Margaret E. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% | |
| 13 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 15 | BASSON Bayley D. | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | JENKINS Hannah G. | - | 5% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | |
| 18 | GARDINER Sophia A. | 12% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | OLSEN Jen | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 20 | BAO Andria | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 21 | FENTON Barbara R. | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 22 | MAO SHIYI | 3% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | VAYNBERG Ellen | 6% | 66% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 24 | CHEN Miley | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 25 | ZHEN Ellen | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.