The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
2 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
3 | XU Audrey | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 1% |
3 | KIM Rachel | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
5 | BOLES Amanda | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
6 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 17% |
7 | ZHENG Zoe | - | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
8 | TSANG Catherine | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
9 | ENRILE Erica | 1% | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
10 | MANN Sophia | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
11 | YANG Audrey | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
12 | OH Ceana | 1% | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
13 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
14 | CHU Camille | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
15 | LENK Sophie | 1% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
16 | MU Allison | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
17 | GOEL Riyana | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
18 | YANG Chloee | 51% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
19 | LIU Jessica | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
20 | DENG Melissa | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
21 | TUAN Sophie | 2% | 38% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.