Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RHODES Zander | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
2 | CHUSID Renata M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
3 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
3 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
5 | JING Emily | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
6 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
7 | STAMOS Maria | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
8 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
9 | JING Alexandra | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
10 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
11 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 3% |
12 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
12 | HO Brianna W. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
14 | WU Irene M. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
15 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
16 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
17 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 12% |
18 | XUE Alanna | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
19 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | - |
20 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
21 | JANG Kimberley | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
22 | LI Meilin | - | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
23 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
24 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
25 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
26 | XU Madison | - | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | YU Lauren C. | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
28 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
29 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - |
30 | WANG Chloe | 6% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
31 | WONG Sophia M. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | HUNT Abigail S. | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | ROY Layla | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
34 | PAVE Claire | 33% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
35 | LENZ Zoe N. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
36 | HUANG NATALIE | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
37 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
38 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 13% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
39 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 32% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
41 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
42 | WANG Reese | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.