Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Ivy | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | SERBAN Samantha M. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | JING Emily | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 5 | HO Brianna W. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | PEVZNER Victoria | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 7 | DAVIA Daniella V. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | MILLER Naomi E. | V D V D D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 10 | JING Alexandra | V V V V D V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 11 | CHUSID Mikayla | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | WONG Sophia M. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 14 | LI Meilin | D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | SARTORI Taylor M. | V D D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 16 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | D V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 17 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V V V D V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 18 | CHEN Jia P. | D V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 19 | LEE Bethany W. | V D V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 20 | ROY Layla | D V D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 21 | XUE Alanna | D V D V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 22 | ZHANG Alina C. | D D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | EYER Hailey M. | D V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | ACHILOVA Feyza | D V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | XU Madison | D V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | SEO IRENE Y. | V D D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 27 | YU Lauren C. | D D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | WANG Chloe | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | HUNT Abigail S. | D V D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 30 | PAVE Claire | V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 31 | HUANG NATALIE | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | BECCHINA Claire E. | D V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 33 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 34 | MARKOVSKY Nina | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 35 | LENZ Zoe N. | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 36 | SLASKI Caroline O. | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 37 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 38 | PAULUS Isabella | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 39 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 39 | SIMONOV Dasha | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.