Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 2 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 3 | PRIHODKO Nina | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 3 | FENG ge | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | < 1% | |
| 5 | SMUK Daria A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 6 | YU Nicole J. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 7 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 8 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 9 | APONTE Monica I. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 10 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 11 | VINE Melissa | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 12 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 13 | SAAL Anna | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 14 | MUELLER Emma M. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | SHU Youshan | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | MAMEDOVA Farah | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 18 | BENZAN India | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | HICKS Grace | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.