Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JING Emily | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
2 | BREKER Anika | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
3 | REN Olivia Y. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
3 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
5 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
6 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
7 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
8 | WU Julianna Y. | 11% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
9 | GONG Christina S. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
10 | LIU Cynthia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
11 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
11 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
13 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
14 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
15 | SHEN Lydia | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
16 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 13% |
17 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
18 | LI Meilin | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 2% |
19 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
20 | XUE Alanna | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
21 | WU Irene M. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
22 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
23 | FU Qihan | 6% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
24 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
24 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
26 | XIANG Emma | 8% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
27 | SU Michelle | 4% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
28 | HUANG NATALIE | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
29 | WANG Chloe | 6% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
30 | DU Hannah | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
31 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
32 | OLSEN Jen | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | WININGER-SIEVE Taylor | 30% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
34 | GAO Anna | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.