Magic City SYC/RCC

Youth 12 Men’s Epee (Y12ME)

Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 12:00 PM

Register

Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2436 2548 - 2355
5 - 8 2198 2267 - 2154
9 - 16 1980 2159 - 1862
17 - 24 1490 1812 - 941

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Corbin, Bennett Tampa Fencing & Tennis Academy E22 2548 2287.78
2 Park, Sangwook LE CLUB TOUCHE E22 2458 2182.64
3 Huang, Kenneth Fencing Center Of Chicago U 2383 2127.48
4 Mazaheri, Fletcher Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 2355 2096.73
5 Chen, Jayden Medeo Fencing Club U 2267 2006.96
6 Herndon, Liam Fencing Institute Of Texas U 2205 1950.17
7 Yang, Gary Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 2165 1909.53
8 Ayotte, James Cardinal Fencing Academy U 2154 1895.56
9 Moore, Alexander Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 2159 1892.32
10 Kim, Julian Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 2057 1796.36
11 Cha, Patrick Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 2014 1718.18
12 Lioznyansky, Miron Alliance Fencing Academy U 1986 1688.87
13 AHN, EZRA Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 1972 1651.67
14 Roberts, Arthur Alliance Fencing Academy U 1907 1643.66
15 Wang, Marcus Penta Olympic Fencing Club U 1886 1588.39
16 Chang, Matthew Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 1862 1537.23
17 Carceller, Jeremias Epee Miami Fencing Club U 1812 1488.75
18 Jiang, Harry Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 1654 1252.58
19 Fong, Henry Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 1590 1247.21
20 Nam, Nathaniel Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 1528 1170.83
21 Grigorenko, Gleb Alliance Fencing Academy U 1533 1153.45
22 Choi, Philip Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1754 916.50
23 Geurtsen, Henry Georgia Fencing Academy U 1112 244.84
24 Lundt, James Willard Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 941 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!