Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
2 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
3 | KWALWASSER Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | |
3 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% |
5 | KANG evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% | |
6 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% | |
7 | PRIMUS Nazir | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% | |
8 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 22% |
9 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
9 | WANG Oscar | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
11 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
12 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 30% | 4% | |
13 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
14 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
15 | CHENG Cody | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
16 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
17 | WANG daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
18 | BODKIN Jake M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
19 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
20 | LEUNG Ian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
21 | DOCIL Jack | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
22 | ZHENG LEON | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
23 | ABDEL-DAYEM Ibrahim | 100% | 83% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
24 | TIAGI George | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
25 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
26 | NAYAK Surin K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% | 3% |
27 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
28 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
29 | COUNTS Nicholas | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
30 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
31 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
32 | MENDOZA Diwa | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
33 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
34 | AGARWALA Mukul | 100% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
35 | MONTALVO Matthew | 100% | 97% | 74% | 28% | 4% | - | |
36 | PRAJAPATI Devin D. | 100% | 56% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | LAWSON Timothy P. | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
38 | LAGASSE Jack T. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.