The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIN Daniel | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
2 | QIU Nathan | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
3 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 23% |
3 | KUMAR Sachit | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
5 | KROON Lucas | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
6 | YANG Dylan | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 4% |
7 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% |
8 | GAO Marcus | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
9 | ZHOU James Y. | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
9 | KILARI Krish | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
11 | LI Yiwei | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 35% | 8% |
12 | CHEN Lohen | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
13 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
14 | RAMANAN Govind | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
15 | LAM Ethan | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
16 | HOLZ Lucas | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
17 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
18 | JOO Jeein | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 46% | 16% |
19 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
20 | HRISTOV Kris | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
21 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
22 | KANG Evan | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
23 | NORRIS Mateo | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
24 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 1% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
25 | WANG HongXi | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
26 | JORGESON Charlie | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | HO Anson | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
28 | HWANG Jayden | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
29 | TSE Aiden J | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
30 | LI linze | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
31 | TUNG Ryan | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | ANDRES Michael | - | < 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
33 | LLAMAS Martin | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
34 | GAY Jono | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
35 | MONSON Eli | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
36 | OLARIO Raphael | 4% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
37 | POLEYUMPTEWA Connor | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | CHAN Henry | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
39 | IYER Neil | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | LI Yidong | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | JOHNSON Kai | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
42 | MATALIA Soham | 12% | 43% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.