The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | JOO Natalie | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 2 | LUO Miranda | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 39% |
| 3 | CHAN Ella | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 3 | HAN Gian | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 5 | ZOU Ella | - | - | 7% | 68% | 25% | |
| 6 | DUAN Sophie | - | 3% | 21% | 53% | 23% | |
| 7 | DENG Claire | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 8 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 18% | 52% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 9 | CHAN Mila | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 10 | HAFEZ Sahar | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 11 | YU Sophie | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 12 | TULYAG Sayda | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | OLSHANSKY Dalia | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 14 | HOM Avery | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | FUNG Sarafina | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 16 | UHLIG Natalie | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 17 | TAI Taphanie | - | - | 5% | 35% | 60% | |
| 18 | LI Joy | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 19 | LIU Ariana | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 20 | SAIFEE Zahra | 8% | 38% | 45% | 8% | - | |
| 21 | NAYGAS Alexandra | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 22 | KIM Sydney | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 23 | HOM Emma | 33% | 50% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | LEE Zoe | 42% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | MA Isabelle | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | LIU Angelina | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 27 | ANSARI Sara | 32% | 48% | 19% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | TAI Penelope | 3% | 26% | 53% | 18% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.