The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 33% |
| 2 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 3 | HU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 3 | TAN Adelyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 5 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 6 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 7 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 8 | STONE Coral | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 9 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 11 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 12 | WANG Jingming | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 14 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | BAVIPATI Smira | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 17 | WANG Peijia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 19 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 20 | REGANTI Sitara | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 22 | LOMOTAN Addison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 23 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 100% | 96% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | MARSHALL Aimee | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 26 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 29 | SEAL Cameron I. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 30 | HAN Emma | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | SAWANT Asmi | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | POIRIER Hailey | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | NELLIGAN Hutton | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.