The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 2 | KIM Rachel | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 3 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 5 | CALISE Ella | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 6 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% | |
| 6 | HSU Kaylin | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 8 | YAN Noelle | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 9 | CUI Alivia | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 10 | REN Kayley | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | SWANSON Alexa | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 12 | PENG Charlotte | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 39% | 7% | |
| 13 | LENK Sophie | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | ZHANG Ivy | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 15 | BEAVER Ava | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 42% | 8% | |
| 16 | KIM Chloe | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 17 | ZOU Ella | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 18 | COX Sophia | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 3% |
| 19 | KIM Sydney | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 20 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 6% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | LUO Miranda | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 22 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | OH Ceana | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 24 | DAVIS Logan | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 24 | YANG Audrey | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 26 | SAIFEE Lamya | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 27 | HO Addison | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 28 | JOO Natalie | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 29 | BARTON Nanea | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% | |
| 31 | DHARWADKAR Ovee | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | DUAN Sophie | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 33 | HAN Gian | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | OLSHANSKY Dalia | 10% | 38% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | SEAL Ayda | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | KRYLTSOVA Eva | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 37 | FUNG Sarafina | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | YUEN Elsie | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | DESAI Esha | 19% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | SAIFEE Zahra | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | UHLIG Natalie | 38% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | LI Joy | 33% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | DENG Claire | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | MONAT Jennifer | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | LIN Allison | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | HOM Avery | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | CHAN Ella | 22% | 47% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | YUEN Sophienne | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 49 | TAO Ann | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | TULYAG Sayda | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | MASANGKAY Sofia | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LIU Angelina | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | MADANNAVAR Trisha | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.