The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Olivia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% | |
2 | MUN Brianna K. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
3 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
3 | PHUKAN Indra | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
5 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% |
6 | WANG Jessie | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
7 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
8 | GUAN Isabella | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
9 | PENG Marie | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 2% |
10 | WANG Angelina | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
11 | GUO Luxi | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
12 | PACHECO Evangeline | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
13 | LIN Ariel | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
13 | CHUNG Penelope | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
15 | CAMAMA Tessa | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
16 | CHANG Abigail | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
17 | TUMANYAN Victoria | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% | |
18 | KWON Genevie | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
19 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - | |
20 | YIN Gabriela | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
21 | LEE Camilla | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
22 | NAIR Supriya | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
23 | XU Celina | 13% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
24 | WANG Victoria | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
25 | LEE Megan | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | COHEN Shaina | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
27 | MOLLINIER Anais | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
27 | GERARDIN Audrey | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
29 | BELFOR A Kate | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
30 | DAYAL Saahira | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | CHEN Samantha | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
32 | WANG Sara | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
33 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 16% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
34 | BENNETT Vienne | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
35 | MULAGARI Swarasai | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
36 | YOU Evelyn | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
37 | MA Ashley | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
38 | SALISTRA Emilia | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
39 | MYERS Cal | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
40 | GARINEY tanvi | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
41 | SCHOR Madeleine | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | BHATT Anisha | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
43 | JAMES Ashley | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
44 | WU Jalyn | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
45 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.