Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports Center - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZENG Noah | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
2 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
3 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 35% | |
3 | NOBLE Colin | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
5 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
6 | WU Wilmund | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 42% | 10% | |
7 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
8 | YOU Jaden | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
9 | STERN Tobias | 1% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
10 | DENG Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
11 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
12 | PIWOWAR Alex | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | |
13 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
14 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
15 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
16 | TANG Shu Hon | 1% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
17 | YEUNG Jerry | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
18 | KIM Matthew | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
19 | BREKHMAN Eric | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
20 | BROU Inkosi | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
21 | WAXLER Seth B. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
22 | OKEEFE Mitchell | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
23 | SHTEYN Mark | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
24 | GOLD Carter | 3% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
25 | SIMMONS John M. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
26 | SHI Erick | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | LEONARD Charles | 3% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
28 | WANG Oscar | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | DEKA Tanush | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
30 | BOMBONATI Alberto | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
31 | IDRISSI Idris | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
32 | CHENG Hong | 51% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
33 | GOLDMAN Robert | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
34 | WONG Caleb W. | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
35 | TIAGI Daniel | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
36 | LASKOW Oliver | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
37 | XIA Eric | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
38 | DAI Gary | 18% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
39 | ONG Chinli | 8% | 36% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
40 | WAGNER Calvin | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | ZHOU Grant | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
42 | SEN David | 57% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
42 | HO Liam | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
44 | HOU Bowen | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.