Orlando, FL - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHOW William T. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 2 | LIU Vince | - | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
| 3 | HU Christopher | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | ||
| 3 | KALPATHY Rohit | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 10% |
| 5 | SU Landon | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 6 | ANAND Rohan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
| 7 | JORGESON Charlie | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 8 | NGUYEN Anthony | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 9 | ANDRES Michael | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 10 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 4% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | ||
| 11 | LIN Philip T. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 12 | VAID Luke | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 13 | SO Preston | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 14 | HUNG Samuel | 6% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | ||
| 15 | KIM Ethan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 16 | KWALWASSER Eric | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 18% | ||
| 17 | ANAND Rishab | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 19 | PARKILA Lukas | 7% | 35% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | GUYDOUK Alexey | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 21 | HERDA Tiger | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | MELUL Jonathan | 11% | 40% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | RONG Jasper | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | ||
| 24 | LI AYDEN | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 25 | HU Andrew | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | ZHANG KAIQI | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.