Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
2 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
3 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
3 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
5 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 7% |
6 | LI Rachel Y. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 50% | 20% |
7 | YANG Iris | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
8 | YU Lauren C. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
9 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
10 | XIANG Emma | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 14% | 1% |
11 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
12 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | |
13 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
14 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
15 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
16 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
17 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
18 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
19 | MI Aileen | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
20 | ROY Layla | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
21 | GU Emily | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
22 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 40% | 51% |
23 | LEE Lavender | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
24 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
25 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% |
26 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
27 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
28 | HOU Wendong | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
29 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 5% |
30 | MI Anning | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
31 | YANG Lingting | 1% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | YAO Ada | 2% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
33 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
34 | SU Michelle | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
35 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
36 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
37 | CHARALEL Jessica | 3% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
38 | SHA Yi Ling | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
39 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
40 | ZHOU Catherine | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
41 | SONG Yuqiao A. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
42 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
43 | HU Felice | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
44 | RICHARD Clara | 24% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
45 | FU Qihan | - | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
46 | SHENG Chuxi | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
47 | WEI Angela | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
48 | FIELD Julianna | 7% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
49 | PAULUS Isabella | 15% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
50 | LIN Victoria T. | 19% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
51 | CHEN Jasmine | 12% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
52 | UNGERER Frieda | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
53 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - |
54 | JIANG Claire | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
55 | LEVY Avery | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | HOBSON Ava | 2% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
57 | PARK Leah | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
58 | NEUMAN Sophie | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
59 | LUH Mia P. | 14% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
60 | WANG Jasmine | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
61 | HOWELL Jocelyn | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
62 | BENNETT Abigail | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
63 | GOLDSON Jordyn V. | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
64 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 50% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
65 | WANG Rachael | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | RICHARD Dominique | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
67 | MADSEN Ansley | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | LI Eleanor | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.