New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 2 | FENG ge | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
| 3 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 3 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 5 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 6 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 7 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 8 | DI TELLA Isabel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% | |
| 9 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 10 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
| 11 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 12 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 13 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 14 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 15 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | TAUBLER Michelle | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 17 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 18 | REID Sobia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 19 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 20 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | |
| 21 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 22 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 24 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | |
| 28 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | PAYNE Elizabeth | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | - |
| 31 | GAO Judy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
| 32 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 34 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 35 | ETZEL Rowan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | SONG Angela | 100% | 77% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 97% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HAND Grace | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 44 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 45 | LI Alisha | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | MOK Chloe R. | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | LI Fei | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.