New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
| 2 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
| 3 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 6% |
| 3 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 5 | GU Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 28% | |
| 6 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
| 7 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 17% |
| 8 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | |
| 9 | FU Qihan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 6% |
| 10 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
| 11 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 12 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | MI Anning | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 14 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 10% | |
| 15 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | |
| 16 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | SEGAL Lydia G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 18 | CILLEY Reid (Amanda) N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
| 19 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 13% | |
| 20 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 21 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 22 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | RICHARDS Ella | 100% | 66% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 26 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 28 | ROHRING Anna | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 28 | SCARLETT Skye | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | HSIEH Sabrina | 100% | 71% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | KAPOOR Saanvi | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | GAO Zhuning | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | WININGER-SIEVE Taylor | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | MORRISON Julie | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | KYIJONG Tenzin | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | MORIN Charlotte | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | BURNHAM Sarah | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | YOUNG Abigail | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.