New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
2 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
3 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
3 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
5 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
6 | YANG Duncan (BoTong) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
7 | WANG Robert | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
8 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
9 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
10 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
11 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
12 | FRIEBUS Andres F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
13 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
14 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
15 | ABDELLAHI Aziz | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
16 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
17 | BIDWELL Ryder | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
18 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
19 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
20 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
21 | WANG Oscar | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
22 | STONE Brad | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
23 | PODDAR Shameek | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
24 | ALFARO Lucas | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
25 | WHITCOMB William | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.