Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LUNG Katerina | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | LIU Jaelyn A. | V V D V V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
5 | SHEN Lydia | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | CHEN Jia P. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
7 | SENIC Adeline | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
8 | YANG Iris | V V V V D D | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
9 | CHUSID Mikayla | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | JING Emily | V V V V V V | V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
11 | EYER Hailey M. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
12 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
13 | BATRA Chaahat | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
14 | WONG Sophia M. | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
15 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
16 | ZHAO Sophie L. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
17 | JANG Kimberley | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
18 | GUERRA Sofia E. | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
19 | LI Rachel Y. | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
20 | CHO Rebecca H. | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
21 | PEVZNER Victoria | V V V D V V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
22 | PENG Amber L. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
23 | CHANG Elizabeth | V V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
24 | SIMONOV Dasha | V V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
25 | SUN Ruoxi | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
26 | GU EMILY | V D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
27 | ORVANANOS Anice | D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
28 | LIU Angel(Daying) | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
29 | RANDOLPH Piper | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
30 | PANT Anisha | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
31 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
32 | FEDELI Caterina S. | D D V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
33 | GOOR Viviene E. | D V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
34 | SUN Chien-Yu | V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
35 | CHEN Allison V. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
36 | ZHANG Alina C. | V D V V D V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
37 | ROY Layla | V D V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
37 | ZHOU Catherine | D V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
39 | CANNON Lira J. | V V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
39 | KIM Rachel | V D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
41 | MEI Sarah | V V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
42 | KOSTELNY Alexis | V D V V D V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
43 | MARKOVSKY Nina | V D V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
44 | KOSLOW Amicie | V V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
45 | SOLDATOVA Maria | V V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
46 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | D D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
47 | FU Qihan | V V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
48 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
49 | SEO IRENE Y. | V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
50 | MI Aileen | V V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
51 | CHOW Annabelle | V V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
52 | CUI Amy | V V V D D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
53 | CHEW Alexis T. | V D V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
54 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | D D V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
55 | VO Bao-Vy | D D V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
56 | LEE Lavender | D V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
57 | HOBSON Ava | V D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
58 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
59 | OTEYZA Camille | V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
60 | LIN Victoria T. | D D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
61 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | D V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
62 | HAYES Alyssa R. | D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
63 | CHARALEL Jessica | D V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
64 | WANDJI Anais | V D D V D D | V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
65 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | V V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
66 | LUO Sandra J. | V D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
67 | BEAVER Hannah | D V V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
68 | YANG Lingting | V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
69 | ZULUETA Catherine | V D D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
70 | HWANG Alison | V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
71 | WANG Jasmine | V V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
72 | BRANDON Fionnoula | D V V V D D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
73 | LI Sophia M. | D D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
74 | CHEN Chloe I. | V V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
75 | SHMAY Anastasia | D V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
76 | SHA Yi Ling | V V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
76 | LUH Mia P. | D V D V D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
78 | ZHENG Julie | V V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
79 | LEVY Avery | D V V D D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
80 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
81 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | D D V D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
82 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | D D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
83 | CHEN Renee | D D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
84 | MANIKTALA Prisha | D D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
85 | ZHANG Eunice | D D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
86 | SU Michelle | D D D V D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
87 | JIANG Claire | V D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
88 | ZHUANG Christina | V D D D V D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
89 | BENNETT Abigail | D D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
90 | BIODROWICZ Julia | D V V D D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
91 | SHIM Grace | D V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
92 | VAUGHAN Norah | D D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
93 | FUNG Emma | D D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
94 | ZHANG Selena | V D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
94 | MADSEN Ansley | V D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
96 | STRUGAR Steliana | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
97 | KOKES Gwendolen | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
98 | PARK Leah | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
99 | LENZ Zoe N. | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
100 | ROHRING Anna | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
101 | BAWA Sahana | D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
102 | LEE Fiona E. | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
103 | SULTER Aurelie | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
104 | RAO Sonia D. | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
105 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | D D D D D V | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
106 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | V D D D D D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
106 | BASSIK Eva | D D D V D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
108 | UMAP Arna | D D D V D D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 | |
109 | ENRILE Erica | D V D D D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
110 | HAN Crystal | D D V D D D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 | |
111 | COOPER Piper W. | D D V D D D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 | |
112 | LAI Sophia | D D D D D V | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
113 | PAULUS Sloane | D D D D D V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
114 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | D V D D D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
115 | HAN Ashley | D V D D D D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
116 | YAN Noelle | D D D D V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
117 | HIMMEL Alexandra | D D D D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
118 | CASTANEDA Keira | D D D D D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 | |
119 | CHOI Kailyn | D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
120 | LI Irina | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
121 | BOLES Amanda X. | D D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
122 | SHUM Maya | D D D D D D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 | |
122 | PAULUS Isabella | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
124 | QUINN Anna | D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
125 | MU Allison | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
126 | YU Jane | D D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
127 | BROWN Lily | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.