Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 78% |
| 2 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 3 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 3 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 5 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 34% |
| 6 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 7 | YANG Iris | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
| 8 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 9 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% |
| 10 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 11 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% | |
| 12 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 3% |
| 13 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 14 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 25% |
| 15 | SUN Chloe | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 16 | KIM Rachel | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 17 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 44% | 5% |
| 18 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 19 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
| 20 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
| 21 | MI Aileen | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 3% |
| 22 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 6% | 31% | 45% | 17% | |
| 23 | LI Sophia M. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 24 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 25 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 27 | STRUGAR Steliana | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 28 | VO Bao-Vy | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | HAN Crystal | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 32% | 7% | |
| 30 | SHIM Grace | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 31 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 5% |
| 32 | WANG Jasmine | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 33 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 41% | |
| 34 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 31% | 3% |
| 35 | HSU Kaylin | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | SHUM Maya | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 37 | JIANG Claire | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 38 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% |
| 39 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 2% | |
| 40 | ZHUANG Christina | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 30% | 3% | |
| 41 | MU Allison | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | NAIR Supriya | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 43 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 44 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 32% | 4% |
| 45 | YANG Audrey | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 46 | BADLANI Diya | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHANG Ivy | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | ZHENG Zoe | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 49 | YAN Noelle | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 50 | HAN Ashley | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | WANG Jolie Z. | 14% | 45% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | WRIGHT Taliyah | 5% | 30% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | SHEN Emilia | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 54 | LUH Mia P. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZHANG Selena | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 55 | SWANSON Alexa | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 57 | BOLES Amanda X. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 58 | KO Claire | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 59 | WRIGHT Trinity | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | PEVZNER Nicole | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | PARK Lina | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 63 | DAVIS Logan | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 63 | PARA Akshaya | 22% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 65 | BEAVER Ava | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 66 | SHENG Katherine | 7% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 67 | PAULUS Sloane | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 68 | ALLEYNE Taylar | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | FENG Grace | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 71 | YU Jane | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 72 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 73 | GUO Lily | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 74 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 75 | LAI Sophia | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | WANG Sunny | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | EVELAND Zoe | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 77 | DENG Melissa | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 79 | PENG Charlotte | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 80 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 81 | MORALES Paulina | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 82 | LENK Sophie | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | BROWN Lola | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | REN Kayley | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 85 | BROWN Lily | 3% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 86 | COX Sophia | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 87 | LUO Miranda | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | ALKADI Mai | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 89 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 90 | LI Han | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 91 | GAO Anne | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | PARK Zena | 20% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 93 | CHUANG Ramona | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 94 | HANNAH Abigail | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 95 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 96 | DESERANNO Seren | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.