Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 2 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 3 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 3 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
| 5 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 6 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | |
| 7 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 8 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 9 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% |
| 10 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 11 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | QIU Emily | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | NIX Reagan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 14 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 15 | SONG Angela | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 17 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 18 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 19 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 15% |
| 20 | PATIL Amulya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 21 | HAYNES Antonia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 23 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 24 | YILMAZ Pinar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 25 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
| 26 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 27 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 28 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 29 | WANG Ziqi | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% | |
| 30 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 31 | ZHAO Ivy | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | SHEN Yongen | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 33 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 34 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 35 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 36 | LEE Claire | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | PROFIS Liora | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 38 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | MCKENNA Analise | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | KINDEL Amara | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 41 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | LUO Amy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHAO Angela | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | YOUNG VIVIAN | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 46 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | KWON Genevie | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 48 | JUN Bomie | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 50 | MEYER Rachel | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | PRESMAN Aerin | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | STERR Isabella M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 13% | |
| 52 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 54 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 55 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 57 | MIRZA Annoshae | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 58 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | YERIAN Ayda | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 60 | HASIM Eurietta | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 61 | QIAN Irene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 62 | GUAN Isabella | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 63 | NEELAM Navya | 100% | 91% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | AGAON Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 65 | FOUX Abigail | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 67 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | MEYER Rebecca | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 69 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 70 | LEE Gloria | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 71 | SCHMITT Harper | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 72 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 73 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | |
| 74 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 75 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 76 | ANDERSON Melody | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 77 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 78 | LIU Charlotte | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 80 | KUMAR Anusha | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 82 | SNYDER Kathryn | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 83 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 84 | MONOVA Lilyana | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 85 | KROPP Anne | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 86 | JONES Veronica C. | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 87 | HOY Emmarose | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 88 | WRIGHT Madison | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.