Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
2 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
3 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 14% |
3 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
5 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
6 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
7 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
8 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
9 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
10 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
11 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
12 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
13 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
14 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 29% |
15 | DHAR Layla | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
16 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
17 | TAN Adelyn | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | < 1% |
18 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
19 | BERMAN greta | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
20 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
21 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
22 | XU ALINA | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
23 | SPEARS Mya B | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
24 | GARRETT Madrid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
25 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
26 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
27 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
28 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
29 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
30 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
31 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
32 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
33 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
34 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
36 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
37 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
38 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
39 | DAMBAL Sasha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
40 | DEHON Inès | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
41 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
42 | HSU leah | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
43 | WANG Callie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
44 | CHO-SAYEGH Emily | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
45 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
46 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
47 | CANSECO Carly | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
48 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
49 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
50 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
51 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
52 | BELEV Christa | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
52 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
54 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
55 | BLAKE Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
56 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
57 | CAO Sophie | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
58 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
59 | HU Anna | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
60 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
61 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
62 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
63 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
63 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
65 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
65 | WANG Peijia | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
67 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | |
68 | NICHOLAS Eva | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
69 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
70 | BUSH Divina | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
71 | POLSTON Ella | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
72 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
73 | BAIRD Kaleah | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
74 | BAIREDDY Maya | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
75 | STONE Coral | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
76 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
77 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
78 | MIKULSKI Maggie | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
79 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
80 | LO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.