Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 2 | LEE REGINA | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | YILMAZ Pinar | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 3 | WANG Ziqi | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 5 | PROFIS Liora | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 6 | LEE Gloria | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 7 | LEE Camilla | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 8 | SCHMITT Harper | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
| 9 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 10 | LIN Ariel | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 11 | WRIGHT Madison | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 12 | RYZA Zoey | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% | |
| 13 | IYER Ishana | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 30% | 6% |
| 14 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
| 15 | WANG Jessie | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | LIN Laura | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | TOFFELMIRE Audrey E. | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
| 18 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 19 | TISMENSKY Abigail | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 20 | BOROTKO Katerina | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 22 | GANSER Nicole | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 2% | |
| 23 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 24 | SACDALAN Leah | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 25 | KROPP Anne | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | GUO Luxi | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | LISCUM Vivian | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 28 | KWON Genevie | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
| 29 | BEATIE Isabella M. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | NEELAM Navya | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 31 | WANG Victoria | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% | |
| 32 | YU Eva | 2% | 16% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | MENKIN Kate | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | PETROFF Eva | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | TISMENSKY Avital | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | FRANGER Macy | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 37 | KANASKAR Ila | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | TALANDZEVICIUS Sophia | 7% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | SONG Charlotte | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | BOREN Ava | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WANG Ziqiao | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 42 | WONG Sydney | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MASLAUSKAS Ieva | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% | |
| 44 | QI Julieanne | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | VAZQUEZ Isabella | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 46 | WU Jessica | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | SUREKA Krisha | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | WANG Cecilia | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | LEE Kate | 32% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | ZHANG Jane | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | CHEN Alina | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 52 | JIANG chenxi | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | CHETWYND Becca | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 54 | ZHONG Isabell | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | KENT Laurel | 3% | 23% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | DAI Chenxi | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 57 | OLUYOLE Isabella | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.