Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
2 | WANG Callie | - | - | 6% | 26% | 47% | 21% |
3 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
3 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 60% |
5 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
6 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 14% |
7 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% |
8 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | - | 1% | 17% | 42% | 33% | 6% |
9 | BLAKE Anna | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
10 | FAN Alexandria | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
11 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | 4% | 24% | 54% | 18% |
12 | BUSH Bethany | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
13 | FUNG Iris | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
14 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% |
15 | BERRIOS Catalina | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% |
16 | HU Anna | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
17 | MIKULSKI Maggie | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
18 | LIU Hannah | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | - |
19 | FOSS Persephone | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
20 | AWAD Royce | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
21 | NEMORIN Rei | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
22 | SENGUPTA Jia | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - |
23 | DUTA Lyra | - | 3% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 4% |
24 | VINOKUR Anita | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 30% | 6% |
25 | GRUBBS Olivia | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
26 | XIONG Alina | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
27 | GONG Joy | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | HSU leah | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
29 | BORGUETA Madison | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
30 | LIANG Claire | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
31 | CHANG Norah | 27% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
32 | GOROKHOVA Marina | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
33 | DHAR Rana | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
34 | CASTELO Soleil | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
35 | PARK Haylie | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - |
36 | LEE Alyson | 58% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - |
37 | KANG Ellie | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
38 | HILD Anya | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
39 | JORGESON Coco (Caroline) | 19% | 53% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
39 | LEE Irene | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
41 | BRIMMER Bella | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
42 | KARAVAS Lucy | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.