Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAN Casey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | |
| 2 | SAYLES Nina R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 3 | HONE Katarina G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 3 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 5 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 6 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 26% | |
| 7 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 9 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 10 | BROWNE Alexis G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
| 11 | MADA Skye | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 12 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 13 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
| 14 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 15 | DANK Dina | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 16 | SUN Alyssa | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 17 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 18 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 5% | |
| 19 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 3% | |
| 20 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% | |
| 22 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 23 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 24 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 25 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 26 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 28 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | LIU Rachel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 30 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 10% | - | |
| 31 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | MENKE Kavya I. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | SADIK HANA | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 35 | TIBURCIO Diana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 36 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 37 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 38 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 40 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 41 | SATHE Mehek S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | NI Sharon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 43 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 44 | YODER Bridget H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | VALADEZ Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 46 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 47 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | 1% | |
| 49 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 89% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | HE Cassandra | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 53 | ARNECKE Lauren A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 54 | DHAR Aamina | 100% | 75% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 57 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 58 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 69% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | PI Sophia | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 71% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | BARTON Mele | 100% | 85% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | CHEN Athena | 100% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.