Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JAAFAR Omar | D V V V | V V V V V V | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 2 | MALLOY Patrick G. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | NORMAN Christian | V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | NENE Ayush | V V V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 5 | CHAMBERS Matthew | V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 6 | PAVLINEC Jack | V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 7 | SOTTILE Cole | D V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 8 | EVANS Grant | V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | TUCKER Evan | V | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 11 | MCGRATH Russell | D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 12 | MACKEVICIUS Nykolas | V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | SCHERNIKAU Jack | V D | V V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 14 | LABROZZI Aidan | V V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 15 | LENAHAN Conor | V V V | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 16 | WEBB Zain | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 17 | JAAFAR Youssef | D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 19 | DULISSE ALeX | V | V D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 22 | ALMANZA Julio | V D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 23 | CAGLE Glenn | V V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 24 | PARCELEWICZ John | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
| 25 | MOELTER Mark | V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | JEON Heejoon | D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | BOWMAN Tamara | V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | VU Khang | V D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 30 | DECKER Carlton | V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | HEFFNER Benjamin | D D | V D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 33 | WALKER Luke | V V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 35 | EUBANKS Austin | V D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 36 | CARY Nicholas | D V V D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 37 | WILEY Morgan | V D V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 | |
| 39 | NICKERSON Edward | D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 40 | SIFFEL Adam | D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 43 | MERRITT Frederick | D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 45 | HALL Leandra | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 46 | COMER John | D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 47 | RYAN Brandon | D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 48 | DAILEY John | D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
| 49 | MCGINNISS Andrew | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 50 | VILLAMOR Lea | V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 52 | LAN Alex | D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 54 | JEROME Jovenson | D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 56 | MARSHALL Emily | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.