Waldwick, NJ - Waldwick, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | GANTA Vijay | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
2 | LUKASHENKO Darii | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
3 | WILSON Jude | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 37% |
3 | MORREALE John | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
5 | NOBLE Colin | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
6 | SHOMAN Zachary | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
7 | GHAYALOD ansh | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
8 | BULL Anderson | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
9 | OVERDECK Andrew | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
10 | MARGULIES William | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
11 | HUANG Ethan F. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
12 | COLE Alexander | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
13 | ZENG Noah | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
14 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
15 | GEORGE Daniel | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
16 | SHOMAN Noah | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
17 | YUAN Kevin | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
18 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
19 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
20 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
21 | HONG Vincent Q. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
22 | NG Jeremiah | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
23 | ALTIRS Alexander | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
24 | JANG Junhyuk | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
25 | DENG Andrew | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
26 | CHEN Evan P. | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | LEDERER Justin W. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | SHTEYN Mark | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
29 | MOULTON Ian | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
29 | CORTEZ Christopher | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.