Birmingham, AL - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | |
2 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | - | 6% | 41% | 42% | 11% | |
3 | XUE ALEXANDER | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 31% | 6% |
3 | TONG ZACHARY | - | 1% | 18% | 47% | 34% | |
5 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
6 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 2% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 5% | |
7 | HONG Steven | 1% | 17% | 42% | 34% | 7% | |
8 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | - | 2% | 25% | 49% | 24% | |
9 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | - | 7% | 30% | 45% | 18% |
10 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 6% | 35% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - |
11 | CHEN Ethan | 38% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | |
12 | ZHANG Derek | 5% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 2% | |
13 | WU Richard | 6% | 35% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - |
14 | ZHOU Hudson L. | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
15 | GRAINGER Graeme | 46% | 47% | 7% | - | - | |
16 | GUREVICH Savely | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.