The Ohio State University Open

Senior Men's Saber

Saturday, October 2, 2021 at 12:30 PM

French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 WILLIAMS Nolan E. - - - - 3% 27% 70%
2 CHEONG Heonjae - 2% 12% 35% 38% 13%
3 MELLONE Carl (Carlo) J. - - - - 2% 21% 78%
3 CHOU Stephen C. - - - 5% 32% 63%
5 SWARTZ Roscoe O. - - - 5% 32% 62%
6 RESHEIDAT Malik - - 4% 25% 43% 25% 3%
7 RICHER Tyler 19% 40% 30% 9% 1% -
8 FERRIS George H. - - 1% 10% 35% 47% 7%
9 ARNIPALLI Shanvanth - 3% 16% 37% 34% 10%
10 BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. - 1% 12% 37% 40% 9%
11 RIGHTLER Samuel - - 5% 23% 42% 27% 3%
12 LAI Yat Hay Casper - 5% 31% 41% 20% 3% -
13 MONTGOMERY Jadon T. - 1% 8% 34% 46% 11%
14 WANG Nicolas - 4% 25% 44% 23% 3%
15 MURRAY Peter 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% -
16 ALOJIPAN Jaydon 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
17 YEN Preston - - 1% 12% 43% 44%
18 WANG Jonathan 8% 31% 40% 19% 2% -
19 HANEY Vincent - - 3% 17% 44% 35%
20 NGUYENBA Thaison 22% 51% 24% 3% - -
21 SCHARDINE James - 5% 21% 38% 29% 6% -
22 LI Qiuye 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 7% -
23 KELLNER Taylor T. - 5% 32% 44% 17% 2%
24 MCCLUNG Gavin 3% 20% 40% 29% 7% 1%
25 GERSTMANN Max T. 3% 19% 45% 27% 6% -
26 DAUM Alan 12% 37% 36% 13% 2% - -
27 LEE Hanho 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1% -
28 WEST Matthew S. 24% 44% 25% 5% - - -
29 STEVENS Jeffrey 44% 41% 13% 2% - -
30 SHEN Christopher 7% 32% 40% 18% 3% -
31 MISIOLEK Keegan J. 5% 31% 43% 19% 3% - -
32 UTLEY James 31% 44% 21% 4% - - -
33 PASZEK Elijah 12% 39% 36% 12% 1% -
34 WEAVER Charles 10% 35% 38% 16% 2% -
35 KRAFT Jon 16% 44% 32% 8% - -
35 LUNDAY Luke 10% 40% 39% 11% 1% -
37 JORDAN Christopher 11% 35% 36% 16% 3% -
38 IDRIS Haashir 17% 40% 32% 10% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.