San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YANG Audrey | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% |
2 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
3 | HO Addison | - | - | < 1% | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
3 | REN Kayley | - | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 32% | 5% |
5 | LUO Miranda | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
6 | DENG Melissa | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
7 | CHAN Mila | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
8 | WONG Cerise | 2% | 12% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
9 | TAO Ann | - | 1% | 5% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
10 | XU Jessica | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
11 | SAIFEE Lamya | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
12 | KIM Sydney | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
13 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
14 | LEE SEO YOOL | 1% | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
15 | HAN Gian | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
16 | MA Isabelle | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
17 | LEE Irene | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
18 | HOM Avery | 35% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
19 | LI Joy | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
20 | HOM Emma | 1% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
21 | SAIFEE Zahra | 36% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.