San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 81% |
2 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
3 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 3% | 25% | 47% | 24% | |
3 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | - | 2% | 20% | 47% | 31% | |
5 | HOBSON Ava | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | - |
6 | PATTERSON Natalia | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
7 | KIM Rachel | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
8 | LEE Ji Ahn | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
9 | FUNG Emma | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 36% | 9% | |
10 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
11 | VO Bao-Vy | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
12 | LEE Samantha X. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
13 | OH Ceana | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
14 | SUN Emily | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
15 | ENRILE Erica | 11% | 58% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
16 | LENK Sophie | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
17 | TSANG Catherine | 1% | 18% | 52% | 25% | 4% | - | |
18 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
19 | LUH Mia P. | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
20 | LIU Jessica | 76% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.