San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 54% |
| 2 | VO Bao-Vy | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
| 3 | LUH Mia P. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 5 | SUN Emily | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
| 6 | PENG Charlotte | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 7 | ZHENG Zoe | 2% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 8 | OH Ceana | 4% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 9 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 10 | CUI Alivia | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | SWANSON Alexa | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 12 | KIM Rachel | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
| 13 | REN Kayley | 3% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 14 | LENK Sophie | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | YANG Audrey | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | MU Allison | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | DENG Melissa | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | HO Addison | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 7% |
| 20 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 22 | XU Jessica | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | LUO Miranda | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 24 | CHAN Ella | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | COX Allison | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | LEE SEO YOOL | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.