Garfield, NJ - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 63% |
2 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
3 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
3 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 44% | 45% |
5 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 12% |
6 | GU Sarah | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
7 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | 2% | 20% | 52% | 26% |
8 | MAO Amy | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
9 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 23% | 1% |
10 | GABERKORN Nadia | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
11 | WITTE Vera | 1% | 23% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - |
12 | GAO Judy | - | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
13 | SZEWC Alexandra | 2% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
14 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% |
15 | ALVIDREZ Francesca A. | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
16 | CLAYTON Alanna | 6% | 32% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - |
17 | REID Anousheh | - | 1% | 17% | 51% | 27% | 4% |
18 | WELLS Emily | 4% | 37% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - |
19 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
20 | FURMAN Maria | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
21 | LONG Cindy | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 37% | 4% |
22 | COSTA LEah | 17% | 54% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
23 | HILLYER Megan | 60% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
24 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 3% | 26% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - |
25 | LI Alisha | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
26 | LEE Olive | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 1% |
27 | GOGINENI Gamana | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - |
28 | JOHN Venus | 2% | 31% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - |
29 | KIM Lynne | 79% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
30 | BARREIRO Katrina | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.