RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOTELLO Natalia | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 2 | GUZMAN Mariana M. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 3 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 3 | SHEN Sarah | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 4% |
| 5 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
| 6 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 7 | MARSEE Samantha | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 8 | CAYRAT Roxane | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | JUNG Irene | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | HILL Julia W. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 35% |
| 11 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 12 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 13 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 14 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 15 | XU Ellen | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 16 | IYER Mohini R. | - | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | TONG Jessie | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHANG Rongruo | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 20 | DESAI Maya D. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 21 | NOVICK Mia J. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 22 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | WU Lanting | 1% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | HOLMES Emma | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 27 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | TSOI Julie | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LIN Nicole | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | MORAN Rhea | 17% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | CHIN Elise | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | TENG Christine Renmei | < 1% | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 33 | HUANG MADELINE | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | YANG Lea | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 35 | GOMES Diana C. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | NGUYEN Siena | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | HITOMI Nadya | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | ANTEBI Sarah | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.