Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MORGAN Quinlyn (Quin) D. | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
2 | IVANOV Yaroslav I. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
3 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
3 | TRASCHENKO POCHMARA Jacob | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 29% | ||
5 | SEZER Kaya | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
6 | CAMERON Matt W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
7 | BAILEY William F. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
9 | PITCHER Skylar L. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% |
10 | ROMANOV Michael | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
11 | HERGAN Daniel | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
12 | LIU Jonathan C. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
13 | JACOBS Tyler M. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
14 | LI Simon A. | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
15 | RYAN Francis D. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | - |
16 | PETREE Justin | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
17 | BURTE Alexander J. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
18 | RYAN Connor Q. | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | ||
19 | STUART Alec J. | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | ||
20 | PEREZ Bernardo A. | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | ||
21 | PATEL Aryoman M. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
22 | JANSEN Jesse | 29% | 40% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
23 | SZELA Tom J. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
24 | ANDERSON David C. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
25 | WHEELOCK Bryan M. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
26 | VOELZ Jim | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
27 | WALKER Andrew J. | 5% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
28 | SINHA Verdhaan | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
29 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | 17% | 47% | 30% | 6% | - | ||
30 | CALKWOOD John D. | 15% | 56% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
32 | LEYLAND John | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.