Event Results
U-M Collegiate Newbie TournamentDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DANIELS Dilan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | GRAY-JONES Jimmy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | DUDZIK Garrett Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | BEEM Noah | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 5 | MAIOCCO Claire Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | LOWRY Esme Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | BYARS Brenna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | CARTER Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | BRANDT Sophia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | WALTERS Elijah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | RICHARDS Sean Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | WIREDU Alden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | VAN DAELE Emily Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | LAUSTER Emerson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | DINGLASAN Jeneia Sherein Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | ISELER Maxwell Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | HUBER Kaitlyn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | FUERST Finley Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | KURFESS Luke Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | PACIFICO Alexa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |