Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DORAN Wesley C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 2 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 3 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
| 3 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 5 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 15% |
| 6 | PARK Sky | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | < 1% |
| 7 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% | |
| 8 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 9 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
| 10 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | |
| 11 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | 7% | |
| 12 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% | |
| 13 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 14 | CO Dylan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 18% | |
| 16 | TAN Peter | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 18 | REYES Omar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% | |
| 19 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | |
| 20 | ANDRIC Borna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 21 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 22 | OROPEZA David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 66% | 21% | 2% |
| 24 | KUO Evan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 25 | HAN Derek | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 25 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 28 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 21% | |
| 30 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | 24% | 3% | |
| 31 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 32 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 33 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 34 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% | |
| 35 | KIM Adrian | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | 8% | - | |
| 36 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 72% | 26% | 3% |
| 39 | CHEN Kelton | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | KETTELLE John | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 74% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | PORTER Rory | 100% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 44 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | JIANG Yehong | 100% | 91% | 46% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | CHEN Leetyan | 100% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | KUANG Aaron | 100% | 89% | 32% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 67% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | PARK Rion | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | TAN Youkai (Isaac) | 100% | 81% | 31% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | MANICKAM Varun | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | LING Eddie | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 53 | BARRETT Austin | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 55 | CAPRA Ethan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 38% | 7% | 1% | |
| 56 | APPL Eli | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | SINGH Kushaal | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | CHANDRA Josh T. | 100% | 51% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.