Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 2 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 3 | PAUL Anna L. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | FALINSKA Julia | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | DUNLAP-SMITH Azaline I. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 6 | SNIDER Margot (Maggie) | V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 8 | BROOKS Tean R. | D V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 9 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 10 | LOMBARD Ella | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | TYLER Syd | V V V D V D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 13 | SCALA Emma | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | SZPAK Lara K. | V D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 15 | WOLF Isabella A. | V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 16 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | D V V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 17 | DOUGLAS Mary K. | D V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 18 | BURN Lauren M. | V V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 19 | DU Yiyun (Doreen) | D D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 20 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | V D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 21 | AHUJA Arianna | D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 22 | SEMMEL Rose F. | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 23 | GUPTA Ananya B. | D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 24 | OH Kaitlin Y. | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 25 | LUONG Shirley | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 26 | BOLES Savvianna | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 27 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 28 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 29 | BECKER Carson E. | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 30 | ONO Melisa | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 31 | REAM Jann L. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 32 | COVITZ Ashley A. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | WU Mia | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.