Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JACOBS Tyler M. | V V V D V | V V V V V | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 2 | HERGAN Daniel | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 3 | CANNON Caiden C. | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LIU Jonathan C. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | TRASCHENKO POCHMARA Jacob | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | ROMANOV Michael | V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | ANDERSON Colton J. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | RYAN Connor Q. | D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 10 | MORGAN Quinlyn (Quin) D. | V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 11 | SEZER Kaya | D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 12 | BAE Junnie | V V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 13 | PATEL Aryoman M. | D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | ANDERSON David C. | V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 16 | JANSEN Jesse | D D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 17 | OAKLAND Brennan D. | V V D V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | LEE Connor C. | V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | RYAN Francis D. | D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 20 | BARLETTA Joseph | V D D V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 21 | CHO Jeremy Y. | D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | PEREZ Bernardo A. | V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | YI Stephen K. | V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | PETREE Justin | D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 25 | LI Simon A. | D D V D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 26 | NOWAK Joseph A. | D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 27 | LOUNDY Alexander J. | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 28 | BENNETT Joseph A. | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 29 | SINHA Verdhaan | V D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 30 | TAN Jacob J. | D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 30 | CALDARARU Sorin | D D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 32 | NORGLE Alexander C. | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | REILLY James C. | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 34 | SZELA Tom J. | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 35 | NIE Justin | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.