Cascade Clash SYC

Youth 10 Men’s Foil (Y10MF)

Monday, February 6, 2023 at 1:00 PM

Register

Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2188 2354 - 2106
5 - 8 2066 2106 - 2021
9 - 16 1963 2066 - 1847
17 - 28 1573 1795 - 1235

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Mazaheri, Fletcher Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 2354 2085.73
2 Fukuda, Brando Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 2160 1904.25
3 Chang, Jeremy Golubitsky Fencing Center U 2106 1854.24
4 Zhou, Shawn Orange County Fencing Center U 2130 1850.51
5 Qu, Zhida (richard) U 2081 1814.51
6 Huynh, Matthew Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 2057 1804.57
7 Wang, Tiger U 2106 1802.77
8 You, Alan U 2021 1734.21
9 Bhupathiraju, Arjun Northwest Fencing Center U 2066 1722.83
10 Yan, Rian Rain City Fencing Center U 2016 1722.22
11 Peskin, Kepler Northwest Fencing Center U 2065 1714.28
12 Kuang, Vincent Northwest Fencing Center U 2019 1649.34
13 Rau, Shogun Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1884 1614.21
14 Yang, Tate Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1919 1608.72
15 Slain, Owen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1847 1571.77
16 Ho, Christopher Rain City Fencing Center U 1890 1570.37
17 Yang, Steve Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1795 1521.61
18 He, Ian Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1774 1507.54
19 Mazaheri, John Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1714 1422.40
20 Roberts, Nikolai Northwest Fencing Center U 1770 1343.94
21 LEE, Joshua Elite International Fencers Club U 1583 1290.40
22 Mazaheri, Theodore Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1583 1270.74
23 shenoy, sean LE CLUB TOUCHE U 1498 1175.85
24 Lam, Lazarus U 1654 1169.07
25 Wong, Connor Prime Fencing Academy U 1480 963.80
26 Ho, Cameron Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1301 937.73
27 Shenoy, Neil LE CLUB TOUCHE U 1235 883.15
28 Toombs, Bennett Orion Fencing U 1492 648.34

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!