North Campus Recreation Building - Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SCHULTZ Alex | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 13% |
2 | GARCIA-ROGERS Kyle | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
3 | BROOKS Zachary | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
3 | CHU Ian | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
5 | AITKEN Andrew | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
6 | KANAR Ian | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
7 | KIM Sterling | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
8 | BROMELL Thomas | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
9 | BECKER Thomas | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
10 | KAROLAK Dale | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
11 | COLWELL Alex | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
12 | MITTAL Sanil | 3% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - |
13 | KWOK Roland | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
14 | ASGARALLY Anthony | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
15 | JANYSKA Allen | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
16 | RAMACHANDRAN Omkar | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
17 | LIN Emily | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
18 | PIGG Dustin | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
19 | HALL Justin | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
20 | CLARK Douglas | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
21 | LEVASSEUR Alec | 18% | 57% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
22 | VUKELICH Daniel | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
23 | WIDMANN Ceili | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
24 | LASALLE Keith | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - |
25 | KOLAKOWSKI Emma | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
26 | ALAMO Brandon | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
27 | PAULSEN Zachary | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
28 | TAMER Cristina | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
29 | TRUMAN Alexander | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | ZHANG Yi | 12% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.