Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LUO Ashley | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
2 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
3 | COBERT Helen G. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
3 | PAN Michelle | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
5 | SMITH Grace L. | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% | |
6 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
7 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% |
8 | YU Nicole J. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 12% |
9 | MUTAKABBIR amira | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
10 | PRIHODKO Nina | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
11 | SAAL Anna | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% | |
12 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
13 | FENG Ge | 12% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
14 | CANNING Charlotte | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
15 | HILL Phoebe | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
16 | PAYNE Elizabeth | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
17 | HICKS Grace | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
18 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
19 | SHU Youshan | 15% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
20 | LONADIER Keira | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
21 | ZHENG Linden | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | |
22 | ANDREEV Victoria | 16% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
23 | LOUGHLIN Ariana | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | JOHN Venus | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
25 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 7% | 32% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - |
26 | YING Julia Y. | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
27 | MAMEDOVA Farah | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | BENZAN India | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.