Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | MITCHELL Philip D. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | BING Charles | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | KWON Ethan | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 5 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 6 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 7 | SCHENCK Koen M. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | LI Eric | V V V D D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 9 | SHA Yi Peng | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 10 | LI Owen | V V V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 11 | KAO Castor T. | D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 12 | HOWARD Michael | D D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | ACHILOV Sayid | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | FU Yifan | V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | JIN Dennis H. | V D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 16 | QI Steve | V V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 17 | BROWN Alexander R. | V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 18 | ALIMI Yacine A. | D V D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 19 | NAGER Noah | V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 20 | LI Arvin | D V V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | GONG Benjamin | D D V D V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 22 | MILLER Aidan A. | D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 23 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | LACHAPELLE Cole | V D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 27 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | V D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | D V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 29 | ZHAO Jesse | D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 30 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D D V D D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 31 | PITERBARG Maxim | D D D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 32 | WU Michael | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | GARDOS Noah | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 34 | BAO Chris W. | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 35 | DAVIDSON Elliot | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 36 | BAUMANN Gunnar | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 37 | REN Bingye | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 38 | HOLCOMB Cedric | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.