Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
2 | SKINNER Graham B. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
3 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
3 | NOBLE Colin | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
5 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
6 | MICHNA Colin P. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
7 | DOLAN Charles R. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
8 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
9 | PIWOWAR Alex | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
10 | ELIN Adam E. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
11 | GOLD Jackson | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 19% | 2% |
12 | TOZZI Massimo | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - |
13 | LI Yao (Liam) | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
13 | HUANG Connor | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
15 | MOULTON Ian | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | WU Wilmund | - | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% |
17 | PENG Bryan | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% |
18 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
19 | KASPER Aaron | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
20 | PANEPINTO HATTORI Fernando | 25% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
21 | HUANG Tom | 5% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
22 | SHTEIN Yan | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
23 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
24 | BRIDGES Benjamin | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
26 | ZHUANG Rayken | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
27 | OWENS Harrison J. | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
28 | BONDARENCO Vlad | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
29 | MORALES Jonathan | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
30 | BENNETT John | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.