Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
2 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
3 | SHEN Lydia | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
3 | WU Julianna Y. | 3% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
5 | WANG Ellen | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 48% | |
6 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | |
7 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 8% | 34% | 44% | 13% | |
8 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 44% | 8% |
9 | TAN Clarisse | 2% | 36% | 43% | 17% | 2% | |
10 | LIU Sophia | - | 20% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - |
11 | FU Qihan | - | 10% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
12 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% | |
13 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 4% | 39% | 42% | 14% | 1% | |
14 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
15 | WU Irene M. | - | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | |
16 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 1% | 29% | 45% | 22% | 3% | - |
17 | DU Hannah | 1% | 22% | 46% | 27% | 4% | |
18 | WEBB Ella | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
19 | KETT-EUBANKS Tegan | 79% | 19% | 1% | - | - | |
20 | LAO Sophia | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | |
21 | CHEN Miley | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
22 | KAPPLER Sabrina | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.